Source # | 13827 |
Entered by | Andrew Knowles |
Checksums | d+t1997-02-17d1.md5 , d+t1997-02-17d1.md5 |
Disc Counts | 2 / 2 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
10-16--02 12/16/2002 |
Other Sources (comments) Taper: Jeff Thomas Source:... (0) Source: DSBD... (0) Source: DAUD... (1) Source: Microtech Gefell... (1) Taper: Tim Settle Source:... (0) flac1648 SBD > DAT... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
02/28/2006 | Jeremy Workman | After reading the comments in the Rendek daud source, I became suspicious of this source as a sbd. the lack of info is suspicion enough. There is clearly a degree of "echo" and some accute crowd noise that one would not expect the on stage mics to pick up. Having not heard the Thomas sbd source I can not directly compare, but I strongly suspect this source comes from a high rig which avoided the usual CU/DU frat boy noise you would expect at the Paramount with school in session. The seeder probably just assumed from the sound quality it was a sbd source. | |
03/16/2006 | Garrett Booth | The David Baty is NOT a digital soundboard. It is not even close. It is more of an AUD, and not even a good one at that. I know it's not a soundboard because you can hear an usher ask a person to return to their seat during the show. Get the Jeff Thomas or Louie Rendek sources if you collect the digital soundboards. They are crystal-clear. Everyone should bury the David Baty source in the ground forever; these types of mix-ups cause way too much confusion in the trading community. End all circulation of this show as a DSBD. |