Source # | 1923 |
Entered by | Matt Vernon |
Checksums | shn-md5 , st5 , wav-md5 |
Disc Counts | 0 / 2 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
11/5/00 01/05/2001 |
Other Sources (comments) AKG481 > Beyer MV100 > SBM1... (1) AKG 481 > Beyer MV100 >... (0) flac16, 44kHz ; B&K 4011's... (0) Neumann KM140s > Sound... (1) AKG 460b/ck61 > V2 > SBM1 >... (0) flac16, 44kHz ; Schoeps... (0) flac16, 44kHz ; B&K 4011's... (0) flac16, 48kHz ; AKG... (0) flac1648 Schoeps MK41V >... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
11/16/2000 | phunk1 |
This source is pretty good. It resembles the Shoepps feel that I have been accustomed to more so than any of the later fall seeds (9-24 on) This is not necessarily a good thing. I think they sound a *bit* muddy. As opposed to a similar(but different) rig on 10-7, that i think sounds exceptionally good. I dont know if this makes any sense to anybody, but the Shoepps sources from this tour were generally exceeding my expectations, and this one falls closer to what i expect, that is...a muddy sound. Alot of you like that sound though...The show itself, however, is great. |
|
11/30/2000 | Col. Forbin |
I agree with the above comments, except to say this source, to me, sounds pretty close to the quality of 10-7. This recording has nice bass response and each instrument sounds clear in the mix. That said, I agree with the comments on Schoeps often having a "muddy" feel to the mix (even though each instrument does have good clarity individually in the recording). Oh! that Piper->Guy Forget!!! |
|
01/04/2001 | Tim Fogel | The set list is incorrect for this show, set 1 song 6 should be Inlaw Josie Wales not Minestrone. Sounds great, thanks! | |
01/05/2001 | Diana Hamilton | Thanks Tim, I've now fixed the typo in the info file here. | |
01/29/2001 | McRoberts | It's not a 'typo' per say, I have chose to name the song as such. I am still stcuk on Minestrone, and it may take me a while to get off! | |
02/28/2001 | James | The song is Minestrone. That's what it was on Trey's solo '99, that's what it will always be. Sorry, I just hate it when people call it the Inlaw | |
04/02/2001 | Eric McRoberts |
Schoeps are not 'muddy' mics in themselves. They tend to be very heavy on the low end...which i like a lot...but the high end is where they are lacking in my opinion. I will come out and say that i don't like the sound of Schoeps high end...especially in large arenas/sheds. I do understand what people say when they characterize Schoeps as muddy and I attribute that to the unpleasing high end sound. I have had the pleasure of running a pair of Schoeps for just under a half a year now and I really dig the low end bass response. Im not a big fan of the 'highs' but I think they perform exceptionally well in smaller rooms...and they're great for stealthing :) |
|
05/01/2004 | allen | in preparation for seeding to bt.etree i have been comparing this and the AKG source for a few days, very loudly via my computer which is wired from my soundcard to my home stereo system. mainly i compared First Tube, Roses Are Free, Piper > Jam (Guy Forget), and Camel Walk. After listening many times over, I prefer the AKG source to this Schoeps source. Just offering up my opinion, YMMV. |