Source # | 4682 |
Entered by | dr.unclear |
Checksums | shn-md5 , st5 |
Disc Counts | 0 / 3 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
7/3/01 07/25/2001 |
Other Sources (comments) SBD MR> DAT> CDR> EAC> SHN;... (6) SBD Master Betty reel > PCM... (3) SBD-> two-track MR-> DAT->... (1) SBD > 4-TRACK RTR @ 7.5... (14) SBD> 16 Track Master Reels>... (4) Bertha Remaster of the... (12) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
09/03/2001 | jim | How does this copy compare quality-wise to the version at gdlive.com? Can someone help me with this? | |
09/04/2001 | atrambler |
the 8-27-72 on gdlive.com includes opening comments and band introductions on cd 1 that is not included on nycheads 8-27-72. Its worth getting from gdlive.com to get this b/c you hear phil saying "this is where we get off the best!" sound quality wise they are very close. |
|
09/05/2001 | Hamilton, Greg & Diana | For the record, the one currently at gdlive.com (there have been different ones up in the past) is shnid 2199. My favorite bit of chat is the the saga of the water truck. :) | |
03/18/2002 | bec. | While this version does contain close to no stage banter at all, sound-wise this is MUCH more enjoyable than the gdlive version. Both come from the same master tapes, but the mastering process on this version is superior. Vocals are back upfront, the instruments are crystal clear and balanced. | |
08/11/2002 | appalled | uh, where did you get the idea that the gdlive version is the same source as this? Please read the text files, folks. The reason there is no banter is because this version is from 16-track masters. The gdlive version IS NOT!!! | |
08/11/2002 | bec | There are several SBDs from one show? That's surprising. I thought the banter was edited out at the RR > DAT transfer. | |
08/11/2002 | appalled | There are at least three masters from this night: 1) The Betty Cantor-Jackson reels 2) The Sunshine Daydream video soundtrack reels and 3) The 16-track masters. | |
03/10/2003 | Brian |
To set the record straight for all the sceptics out there and everyone else: This is the BEST seed that is available now, yea it's a shame that there is no banter, but the sound quality is leaps and bounds better than any other source. That's that! |
|
03/10/2003 | Diana |
Hmm, if you have to qualify a seed with it being a "shame" that something is missing from it that is on another copy, it's hard to argue that it's at the top of the heap. "Best" IMO would be to have "the" primo sound quality version, flaw free, and with famous banter to boot. :) Somebody nudge me when all 3 of those conditions are met. |
|
03/12/2003 | Brian | Let me clarify my original statement. This is the best sounding seed to date with the clearest, non-distorted discernment of instrument levels, vocal levels and all around mix. The loss of banter to me is no loss, because with a little thinking it is very possible to add the banter tracks from the alternate sources and combine them in the correct places to create a full show. If one has not heard this version than I would reccomend finding it, listening to it coming up with their own conclusions, but a dollar says you'll agree with me. | |
03/14/2003 | Diana | Inherent in the term "seed" is that some generous, competent contributor has done the necessary digital prep work (patches etc) for general traders/listeners. Anyone care to reseed under Brian's suggestions? Thanks if so! ;) | |
05/10/2003 | dms | this show fits on 2 SHN discs | |
05/10/2003 | Chuck Frolio | This version combines the "dank" source listed here and with the between-song banter from the Sonic Solutions version. Most tracks, unfortunately, have sector boundary errors. | |
12/21/2005 | A Dude |
My question - if this is from 16 Track Master Reels, then who mixed them down to 2 tracks ? Dick ? Also, if the other 2 sources are a Betty 2 track, and a Sunshine Daydream 2 track, then do these come from two different soundboards on site ? Or are they both from the same soundboard output (in which case the only differences should be the quality of the recorders used and the tape used) ? |
|
12/21/2005 | Charlie Miller | I think it was mixed by Dan Healy...cm | |
12/21/2007 | A_Dude |
I think it unlikely that Dan Healy could do this poor a mix. The drums and lead vocals are way too high, somewhat drowning out the rest of the instruments. (In contrast, the Serafin version (8045) has a good mix, you can hear the guitars, bass and piano much more clearly. |