Grateful Dead 11/01/68 MSR > R > D > CD by Jim Powell EAC > SHN by J.Barnes (heyitsmejess@aol.com) EAC log files are included

Grateful Dead 11/01/68
Armory Building, Silver Dollar Fairgrounds, Chico, CA

Comments

Add Comment

Source Collectors

Add to Collection

Add to Want List

History

Source #	17080
Entered by	dr.unclear
Checksums	shn-md5 , shn-md5-unedited , st5
Disc Counts	1 / 2
Media Size
Date Circulated Date Added	05/06/2003 05/08/2003

Download Text | Download Zip

Other Sources

Source Summary
MSR > R > D > CD by Jim Powell EAC > SHN by J.Barnes (heyitsmejess@aol.com) EAC log files are included

            Grateful Dead

Silver Dollar Fair, Chico 11/1/68

67:10  MSR > R > D > CD > EAC(secure) > SHN

MSR > R > D > CD by Jim Powell

EAC > SHN by J.Barnes (heyitsmejess@aol.com)

EAC log files are included

Intro  0:12

Dark Star > 12:17

Cryptical Envelopment >  1:48

drums >  0:14

The Other One >  10:55 

Cryptical Envelopment >  7:06

New Potato Caboose >  0:41

 [ > New Potato Caboose#    1:44 *

 #Alligator >  2:35 *

 drums >  5:05 *

 Alligator > 4:39 ] *

Alligator/Caution jam >   12:36

Feedback >   6:01

We Bid You Goodnight   0:45

closing comments  0:32

*  severely attenuated signal, useless for music  14:03 total

This tape consists of two segments, the first running for 35:02, from the introduction of the Dead's "last set" through the first 2:21 of New Potato Caboose, and the second starting a couple minutes in to Alligator and running through the end of the set in 32:14.  

At  0:41 of New Potato Caboose the strength of the signal falls away severely in both channels, past all recovery and continues in this state for 14:03 before resuming proper strength and continuing for 19:54 to the end of the tape.

I note that Eaton lists for this date

11/01/68 Silver Dollar Fair, Chica Ca - xcerpt

  4.9, 055min, Sbd, A0D1, Reel M->Dat  1, 44k,

  10inch 8trk Master [EMAIL PROTECTED]>3700 x 0->3700 x 1

After We Bid You Goodnight Phil tells the audience to "Come back next week -- this is a good place."

Latvala played a Viola Lee from this date at one of the Fillmore Dick's Picks Release Parties.

It's not clear to me how all this fits together.

We have mastered both a complete version, including the 14:03 of bad signal, and an edited version, with this segment removed.

Both versions are included in this set.

Show Checksums

shn-md5

569e0fe487119da14780081305b83f65 *Track01.shn

67ccaaeee58a48a781a243cd52d50ae1 *Track02.shn

23c3e20163eafaa9e7a71dd857f03662 *Track03.shn

c13493969ceba569c68996fd2f1f2b3f *Track04.shn

377224813d496d826c3cb3445a336897 *Track05.shn

9ff0e22fd8cab9a1ec9618306d3d90aa *Track06.shn

df89d71979c5d10c783e37c84108f7c7 *Track07.shn

shn-md5-unedited

569e0fe487119da14780081305b83f65 *Track01.shn

67ccaaeee58a48a781a243cd52d50ae1 *Track02.shn

23c3e20163eafaa9e7a71dd857f03662 *Track03.shn

874e688fb3b38d081181297fa3ce2116 *Track04.shn

f8d76af9c3ba8bbe746a647ed0ad53c6 *Track05.shn

7095d16471d2107cfed9a4052b5af76c *Track06.shn

9ff0e22fd8cab9a1ec9618306d3d90aa *Track07.shn

df89d71979c5d10c783e37c84108f7c7 *Track08.shn

st5

71eee7b52784adc5d6f5aff1eef7e06c  [shntool]  Track01.shn

7f3d3217b0659ddf725b84f58488fd85  [shntool]  Track02.shn

564c923b6fe514b631069e287df8e313  [shntool]  Track03.shn

554a2db3ebf294bb9c50d9deb87aeab4  [shntool]  Track04.shn

f860e8942a1ad8875b0f61816aa83fc9  [shntool]  Track05.shn

7acde436a5d984581a05f14f90fe27fa  [shntool]  Track06.shn

821c0973e2430122280ea7df551db9a6  [shntool]  Track07.shn

Comments

Add Comment

Date	User	Comment
Other Sources (comments) 2nd Set; SBD>MSR>C>DAT>CDR;... (0) MSR>C>D>CD; Seeded to etree... (1) SBD>MR>C>D>CD>EAC>SHN;... (0) MSR > R > D > CD by Jim... (3) flac16 ; This is a... (0) flac16/44.1khz Recording... (0)
05/20/2003	jesse barnes	from Jim Powell (sent to deadlists digest volume 4 #77) The version of 11/1/68 I just put into circulation was transferred from first gen reels in the collection of one friend, digitized to DAT and then mastered to CD by another and remastered by a third. It's theoretically possible there's another generation (or five) before the reel we were working with, that my source doesn't know about or isn't telling me about, but this seems highly unlikely. The fact that this version has the missing minutes of bad fidelity itself tends to confirm the idea that this is another lineage.
02/28/2008	SteveSw	My version of this source has two directories, "edited" and "unedited". The "edited" version matches the fingerprint here. The "unedited" version, on the other hand, does not. The problem is with track 5, natch. The info file included with my "unedited" version describes an edit: Lineage: MSR > R > D > CD > EAC (secure) > SHN Track 5a: MSR > R > D > CD > EAC (secure) > SHN > WAV > Cool Edit 2000 > SHN MSR > R > D > CD by Jim Powell EAC > SHN by J.Barnes Track 5a edited by Seth Kaplan and then later I have this comment: Additional note: Attenuated signal sequence (track 5a) was initially almost completely inaudible. Both channels were subsequently run through Cool Edit 2000 and amplified 40 db including reduction of some degree of hiss and removal of several artifacts result- ing in a fairly listenable segment. "unedited" MD5: f8d76af9c3ba8bbe746a647ed0ad53c6 Track05.shn My Md5: c841c624b8b8c16c621405568dcfa9ae Track05a.shn My question is, is that seth kaplan edit in common circulation?
09/20/2008	wally	My two cents…….. I also had 2 sets of files for shn id 17080, one edited and one unedited. I deleted the “unedited” set, because they match shn id 2008 for the same date. Also, the db shows a shn id gd69-11-01.21726 that matches shn id 2008. I think the shn id 21726 should be deleted since it is the wrong date and matches 2008. Also, I think 2008 should be noted as the unedited file set. Does anyone else see it this way? Thanks Salah
09/20/2008	Wally	edited comment- My two cents I also had 2 sets of files for shn id 17080, one edited and one unedited. I deleted the unedited set, because they match shn id 2008 for the same date. Also, the db shows a shn id gd69-11-01.21726 that matches shn id 2008. I think the shn id 21726 should be deleted since it is the wrong date and matches 2008. Also, I think 2008 should be noted as the unedited file set. Does anyone else see it this way? Thanks
09/20/2008	Wally	fwiw- maybe the unedited md5 should be deleted from the zip for shn id 17080? peace salah
09/20/2008	mvernon	gd69-11-01.21726 that matches shn id 20008 has been merged into 20008 (we merge so that folks that linked to 21726 will now link to 20008)
09/20/2008	mvernon	this shnid (20008) was seeded with edited and unedited versions, so we can't delete either of them. the confusion partly arises since the edited and unedited versions use the same filenames for what are actually different tracks so they need to be kept in different directories and here in different checksum files, though they duplicate some fingerprints between them