Source # | 2086 |
Entered by | Matt Vernon |
Checksums | d1 , d2 , d3 , st5 |
Disc Counts | 0 / 3 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
11/30/00 12/02/2000 |
Other Sources (comments) flac16, 44kHz ; (FOB/ORTF)... (3) flac16, 44kHz ; AKG... (0) flac16, 48kHz ; Sennheiser... (0) flac16, 44khz ; [Set 1... (0) flac16, 48khz ; [Set 1... (0) flac16/44.1khz Source:... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
12/15/2000 | Caleb Epstein |
Well, I don't think this is really a matrix tape, but jesus it is one *killer* FOB! Very sweet tape for such a big venue. |
|
01/18/2001 | Bill Gardner |
no way this is a matrix mix. I'm even having doubts about this being FOB but perhaps a shotgun section tape. Just by $.02 |
|
04/05/2001 | Lucas | I would bet large sums of money that this is not an audience tape. Matrix? Likely. But there is DEFINITELY a soundboard feed here. | |
01/05/2002 | Jim Raras |
I had never heard this source before, but I'm transferring the FOB Schoeps mk4(ORTF)>kc5>cmc5>sxm2>ad500e>d10proII source of this show right now so I figured I'd compare. The source I'm transferring is much more 'upfront' sounding than this purported SBD/matrix. I tend to agree w/ Bill that this is an OTS shotgun (or similar) source. There is noticable venue reverb and the bass is not defined enough for me to truly beleive this is a matrix. The vocals are *very* clear, but that is typical of a shotgun tape. Regardless, I think the FOB's I'm about to seed smoke these (more upfront and open sounding and much warmer--I find these 'matrix' tapes somewhat harsh on the ear) so hopefully it will make this debate a moot point. |
|
02/11/2002 | phishjones | I think that the track times for the 2nd disc are messed up. YEM says 12:12 but really is 23:15. ALso, tweezer says 23:18 but should really be 23:22. | |
09/07/2002 | Caleb Epstein |
You're right about YEM (s/b 23:15) but the Tweezer track time is correct at 23:15. Also, this show can be burned cleanly on 2 CDs (1x74 + 1x80) by moving Sample to the end of D1. |
|
10/03/2002 | Mr.Marmar | I have a tendency to believe that this may be an FM Simulcast source....That's why it kinda sounds "squished" and why the audience sounds so "up front" in the mix. I'd be willing to bet the farm on it...do a frequency analysis on it and compare it to any other FM>Cass show you may have...I bet the noise fingerprints are pretty darn close (look around the 10-15kHz range...) That would also explain why Cactus sounds thin on the very low end of his sound... |