Source # | 317 |
Entered by | Matt Vernon |
Checksums | shn-md5 , st5 |
Disc Counts | 2 / 3 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
1/6/00 10/25/2001 |
Other Sources (comments) Master Soundboard Cassette... (9) Recording by Steve Rolfe:... (0) Set 2 Only: zero gen source... (0) Repatch of SHNid=28832 ;... (1) flac16 ; Recording Info:... (0) flac16 ; Recording Info:... (0) flac16 ; SBD and Audience... (0) flac16 ; Recording Info:... (0) flac16 ; Recording Info:... (0) flac16 ; Matrix by Hunter... (0) flac16 ; AUD: 3x Nakamichi... (0) flac16 ; Sennheiser 441's... (0) flac24 ; Recorded 14th row... (0) flac16/48kHz ; Steve... (0) flac24 ; Steve Rolfe's... (0) flac16 ; Recorded 14th row... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
10/07/2001 | Diesel | I don't believe this shn is slow. Instrument tunings match the night after and all nights around this time if that means anything. | |
10/20/2001 | Cornbred |
I don't believe this show is slow either. Bob and Jerry's voices as well as the instruments sound to be in their normal register. And though this isn't definative by any means, I held a guitar tuner up to the speakers during Stagger Lee, and though it wavered, the pitch centered fairly accuratelly on D. The sound quality is ok, though recorded a little too low. I can't tell if there was any noise reduction or not. There are several glitches that should be noted. d2t1 Dancing In The Streets: 08:33 08:36-08:38 08:46-08:50 Right channel static. 10:29-10:31 Momentary loss of volume. Not a complete dropout. d3t2 Black Peter 0:56-0:58 Static/dropout. That is all I noticed, but there may be others. It came with ludicrous disc split. All of set one can fit on one 74 minute disc. Set 2 up to drums on disc 2, and Not Fade Away to the end (~30min) on the third. |
|
10/20/2001 | Cornbred | I forgot to mention, the lineage given is quite wrong as DATs didn't exist in 79. I noted mine simply as SBD>???>DAT, though I think what was probably intended was SBD>Master Reel>DAT. Can anyone give a definative answer to what this is? | |
10/25/2001 | Hamilton, Diana |
These listener comments had been in the shn comments section from pre-db days- I've moving them here since it's more appropriate now: listener Jason Palmer reports quality lacking- theorizes noise reduction; listener James Griffin notes it sounds a bit slow Also I've put a ? in the lineage here thanks to your observations. |
|
06/10/2002 | Hub Spencer | This is a great 79 show. Phil's intro into the Other One has got to be one of the best ever. I noticed the other flaws listed, but isn't the second verse of the Other One missing as well? There is an abrupt cut at 6:58 that must be a tape flip. It is a shame that any of the great playing of Phil during this jam is lost. Possibly another source could be found without this missing part of the show. | |
12/18/2002 | Robert Goetz | An audience version of 10.27.79 does exist. I used to have both an analogy soundboard of this show and an audience. Indeed, there is a second verse and if you count the first two Phil bass thunderrolls, there is a third just prior to the second verse which is equally as explosive and dominant. Hopefully someone will combine these sources to create a complete version. In my opinion, the missing second verse on the soundboard tarnishes one of the finest dead jams ever. Incidentally, I have noticed that several very fine audience recordings of different dead performances are not listed here - such as 10.27.79 and 7.19.74. I wonder where they are. | |
12/19/2002 | scottz | the aud version circulated on CD about a year ago, along with 10/28/79. They aren't really that good sounding, the sbd is much preferred by my ears. But someone could do a patch job if there was music missing on the board. for an awesome aud from this time period, look no further than Bertrando's 10/31. | |
12/19/2002 | Diana | "I wonder where they are." As is the case for any "missing" sources, either no one has made shns out of them and circulated them that way, or if they have, no one has submitted the info yet. | |
01/18/2003 | Greg Yurkovic | I received these SHNs with different file names but the same checksums within the md5 files. The file names of the set are canonical to the usual naming standards (gd79-10-27d1t01.shn, gd79-10-27d1t02.shn, etc.), unlike those in the md5s linked here. | |
01/20/2003 | Diana | If the md5 checksums are the same, it is the same shn set. The checksums are the fingerprints. |