Grateful Dead
03-17-93
Capital Center
Landover, MD
Lineage:
AKG 460/CK8's -> Panasonic SV-255 -> (clone) TEAC DA-P20 FR-DC OTS
Transfer:
Tascam DA-30 (48k) --[coaxial S/PDIF]--> Diamond xTreme Sound Card (48k) 48k->44.1 in Cool Edit Pro, tracked with CDWave, FLAC level 8 encoded
Taper(s): Scott Swayne, Roger Jones, and Joe
d1t01 tuning
d1t02 Shakedown St.
d1t03 Wang Dang Doodle
d1t04 Lazy River Road
d1t05 Desolation Row
d1t06 Ramble On Rose
d1t07 Eternity
d1t08 Liberty
d2t01 tuning
d2t02 Picasso Moon
d2t03 Crazy Fingers >
d2t04 Playin' In The Band >
d2t05 Dark Star(1) >
d2t06 Drums >
d2t07 Space >
d3t01 Two Soldiers Jam >
d3t02 Other One >
d3t03 Days Between >
d3t04 Good Lovin'
d3t05 crowd
d3t06 (e) Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds*
* First Time Played
Though this is similar to shnid# 4681, this new source is not missing anything. The only flaw is a split-second saturation of the signal @ 00:05 d2t06 (the drummers decided to pound hard-enough to redefine the nights level setting).
On the side and for the record:
This is speculation on my part, but it's possible that existing shnid# 4681 could be a relative of this new seed. It's lineage says its 460/CK8s -> BP-1s -> Marantz PMD-700.
Well, we ran AKG 460/CK8's, I had a problematic Marantz PMD-700 on tour with me that was demoted from master deck due to reliability issues, but COULD HAVE still been run as a back-up deck (thus producing 4681).
We also had BP-1 power supplies, but my on-tour notebook and the tapes themselves don't start having the BP-1s reflected in the lineage until a couple months later at the Vegas shows of this year. So. if they are related, it could be a mislabel on #4681, or me being lazy about writing down the BP-1s. I don't see why I would've skimped on writing "BP-1s" down, as I wrote down everything else for each night, and the "BP-1s" start appearing the first day of the Vegas shows in the same notebook I used for the tour. I have not heard #4681 so I can't be sure. If anyone involved in the tapes (Roger, Joe, Carl) can help solve this mystery, please feel free. In any case, like I said, this source is not missing any part of space, as #4681 says it is.
length expanded size cdr WAVE problems fmt ratio filename
0:08.35 1493564 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.4193 gd93-03-17d1t01.flac
12:54.05 136545404 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5551 gd93-03-17d1t02.flac
6:55.23 73260140 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5444 gd93-03-17d1t03.flac
7:38.16 80828876 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5232 gd93-03-17d1t04.flac
11:23.12 120509468 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5357 gd93-03-17d1t05.flac
9:42.53 102789500 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5293 gd93-03-17d1t06.flac
9:20.71 98951036 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5068 gd93-03-17d1t07.flac
6:34.17 69541628 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5467 gd93-03-17d1t08.flac
64:37.07 683919616 B 0.5348 (8 files)
length expanded size cdr WAVE problems fmt ratio filename
0:36.20 6397484 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.4203 gd93-03-17d2t01.flac
6:55.48 73318940 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.6201 gd93-03-17d2t02.flac
8:38.69 91537532 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5423 gd93-03-17d2t03.flac
7:35.64 80412572 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5732 gd93-03-17d2t04.flac
10:14.63 108457820 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5468 gd93-03-17d2t05.flac
9:18.53 98555900 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.4895 gd93-03-17d2t06.flac
5:28.04 57868652 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.3897 gd93-03-17d2t07.flac
48:48.21 516548900 B 0.5304 (7 files)
length expanded size cdr WAVE problems fmt ratio filename
5:14.56 55521356 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.4721 gd93-03-17d3t01.flac
6:43.56 71220956 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5580 gd93-03-17d3t02.flac
10:15.55 108615404 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5215 gd93-03-17d3t03.flac
7:00.31 74160956 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5887 gd93-03-17d3t04.flac
1:58.25 20874044 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.4989 gd93-03-17d3t05.flac
5:06.48 54091340 B --- -- ---xx flac 0.5743 gd93-03-17d3t06.flac
36:19.46 384484056 B 0.5403 (6 files)