Source # | 15261 |
Entered by | Matt Vernon |
Checksums | shn-md5 , wav-md5 , st5 |
Disc Counts | 2 / 2 |
Media Size | |
Date Circulated
Date Added |
2/18/03 02/26/2003 |
Other Sources (comments) shnf ; Schoeps m222/mk41 >... (2) shnf or flac16 ; Neumann... (3) shnf ; B+K (DPA) 4022... (4) shnf ; Neumann km184 >... (0) shnf ; Neumann ak40 >... (0) shnf ; LivePhish SHN... (0) flac16, 44kHz ; Schoeps... (0) flac24, 48kHz ; Schoeps... (0) flac16, 48kHz ;... (0) flac16 44.1kHz Neumann... (0) flac16/44.1khz Neumann... (0) |
|||
Date | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|
02/26/2003 | Allen aka guyforget | ok, so i downloaded this from a server, and it has 2 texts with it. one is the same as whats listed ^up^there^ but the other specifies that its an FOB. the folder that it was in on the server also has .fob in the name. im listening to it, compared to the Neumann OTS source, and i believe that this Lutch source is FOB. | |
03/03/2003 | Ryan Boone | I am listening to this right now and it sounds like an FOB to me. As a matter of fact this is the finest recording I have heard from the Thomas and Mack. (including sbd). Jamie nailed the sweat spot this night. Mike's bass really sounds great to me! | |
11/25/2004 | Read Icculus |
I'm pretty sure the SHN md5s listed here are wrong. The track numbers don't match those for the WAV md5, and they are the same checksums that you see for the Tubes source for this show. See this shnid for more info - http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=15440 Anyone have SHNs that match the WAV md5 when decompressed? |
|
09/01/2008 | jasonsobel | yes, the wrong SHN md5's were posted here. I just edited this db entry with the correct SHN md5's (when decompressed, the WAV md5's match what was already here). So everything here is now correct. |